| Over 60 mph the car had a judder which felt exactly
like the wheels needed balancing. As the old tyres were pretty worn,
I had new tyres fitted all round and the wheels carefully balanced
(I watched the guy do it). Judder just the same as before. During
balancing, it was noted that 2 of the wheels are running very slightly
out of true. Is this likely to be the cause of the problem, or are
there other possible transmission items I should check out before
splashing out on new wheels? The wheels are really light 8-spoke
alloys, 6x14 inch which the car came with, and don't appear damaged
at all under visual inspection. Tyres: Yokohama A539 185x60. (1/01) |
|
You shouldn't need new wheels, at least if the very slightly
out of true is really only very slight. It might be worth borrowing
a set of wheels (or just two?) before you buy new ones.
It's also worth checking the prop shaft for balance and possibly
running out of true - I suppose it's possible it's got bent (although
I've never come across that). I drove a Sierra once that had a
badly out of balance shaft though - it had to be replaced.
It might also be a good idea to get a geometry check done, although
that again shouldn't really cause judder. (1/01)
|
| I did hear from a canadian miata driver that the 5 does this
at about 100kph. I'm told that it dissapears when you get up to
110kph. It is a well known effect. I have not noticed it on mine
as I've had the hard top on since I bought it. (1/01) |
| Over 60-70 MPH won't be balancing as this is more around 30-50
MPG. Get a 4 wheel track or propper 4 wheel aligments done which
should sort the problem. (1/01) |
|
I did hear from a canadian miata driver that the 5 does
this at about 100kph. I'm told that it dissapears when you get
up to 110kph. It is a well known effect.
Yeah - they talk about it all the time on the US list and miata.net.
But they shouldn't do it (ie the cars shouldn't judder). Mine
doesn't. If everything is set up correctly, they don't. Tyres,
wheels, balance of them, wheel geometry, suspension, prop shaft,
chassis rigidity probably all play a part. (1/01)
|
| The other trick in the manual is the dimension from PPF (power
plant frame) linking gearbox to diff .. and the bottom of the chassis
rails .. this dim adjustment has been know to help. (1/01) |
| Did I once hear of something on the Miata list known as the "Miata
shimmy" but IIRC that was at about 50/60mph...? (1/01) |
|
Balancing problems can show at any speed and in very small speed
bands.
You can not say that it will not be balancing because it happens
at a certain speed. In this case, it sounds as though it isn't
balancing as they have all been done, BUT
1) You CAN balance out a SLIGHT out of true.
2) BUT I have had problems with balancers that just simply balls
it up.
What speed range/s does it happen in? (1/01)
|
| In the Miata.net forum, search
for the word "shimmy". This should pull up a good number of threads
relating to this problem. (1/01) |
| Mine still does it, though fitting the cockpit brace has helped.
Balanced wheels, 4 wheel allignment back to factory defaults and
the fitting of a Moss front chassis brace made no difference though.
I was planning to see if a strut brace also helped before going
any further. It's definately a 60 - 65 MPH thing though. (1/01) |
| I had this problem as well. Tyre walls were cracked. But, new
tyres and balancing fixed it. I can now drive in comfort without
having my cheeks shake as if I was in a gravity experiment. I reckon
they cocked up the balancing, take it back and have them check it.
And get the wheel alignment checked at the same time. (1/01) |
|
Thanks to everyone who replied to my question about judder at
60mph plus.
The car did have 4-wheel alignment done when I bought it, paid
for by the dealer when we both saw the 2 old front tyres were
badly scrubbed on the outside... I've got a full 'before & after'
printout of the various adjustments made, but as this point things
get complicated because car's previous (Japanese) owner had lowered
the suspension drastically (2-3 inches?).
Are the standard recommended suspension settings applicable to
a lowered car? I've got no complaints on the car's handling, but
ground clearance is a big challenge on Argyll roads... The Eunos
already has stiffening braces (one over the engine and another
between the seatbelt mounts), plus a big, steel 4-point-mounting
roll cage. So I don't think I can do anything further in that
direction!
A return trip to an alignment place looks on the cards, because
I like this car more everytime I drive it, and I'm determined
to sort the problem. (Trying not to think about cost of replacement
propshaft). (1/01)
|
|
You will not get stock alignment with that much lowering .. just
aim for 1.5 deg or min camber on the rear .. remove 0.5 degree
for the front (so aim for 1) ... set toe in at rear as stock,
set toe at front at zero or little in .. and castor max..
.. and you have not seen the road I got my car up in Italy ..
makes forestry roads in Argyll seem tame (two brothers live down
2-7 miles roads .. passed with 2" lowering no probs ..just 5-10
mph!). The Italian road was a public road .. just had 8" gullies
washed out of it! (1/01)
|
|
I'd consider trying to get it raised a bit. 35mm or so lowering
is OK, but for road use you start to run into problems if lower.
Also you are just not running the suspension in the designed
configuration, and that's bound to lead to various problems, of
which sleeping policemen are the least! (I sometimes touch the
stupid "cushions" around here with standard suspension - I always
try and get one side's wheels on the flat bits.)
The standard alignments need modifying to take lowering into
account. Camber needs reducing the lower it is (quite significantly)
and caster needs increasing (if possible) Has it been lowered
with short springs, or has it got serious shock absorber mods?
I think I'd be looking at replacing the springs with standard
ones, or getting a complete shock absorber/spring pack (eg from
Moss). (1/01)
|
| |