| Driving along the motorway this morning in our
'91 V Special Roadster - noticed the tacho flick down then back
rapidly. Lost power and glided to a halt by a 'phone. RAC driver
suggested it was an "Engine management problem" as the engine would
turn over and fire from the starter, but would not stay running,
and fuel was pumping erratically. Now relayed back to our local
garage. Any suggestions as to what might be the problem....and the
cure? (5/00) |
| Unfortunately sounds like an ECU problem.
Most cost effective solution would be to try and get a s.h one from
Powerdrift. I think an ECU from any
pre 1994 Roadster.MX-5 or Miata will do. (5/00) |
|
First job is to check if the ECU is providing any fault codes.
As it sounds like the ECU is shutting down the engine it's more
than likely.
Things worth checking
1) Ignition switch - these can get bad contacts.
2) Connection to air flow meter.
3) Make sure all fuses and relays are seated properly.
The ECU diagnostic book from Donutz
will help greatly, as would the Veloce Enthusiast's Manual.
PLEASE let us know how it goes and DON'T be persuaded to spend
big money on new ECU etc. until you're totally sure this is the
fault. (5/00)
|
| If the engine fires a little but won't idle, should be the Air
Flow Meter. Check all connections (5/00) |
| I'm afraid that this is how the "broken crankshaft" nightmare
manifests itself. Is the crankshaft pulley loose? (even very slightly)
It's just possible that you have a "Lightweight Sports Crankshaft"
(one of the last). Has the cam belt/front crankshaft oil seal been
replaced recently - or even quite a while ago? (5/00) |
| Is the crankpulley still attached to the engine? You will be very
unlucky if it's this - I was unlucky. hope it's somthing
else. (5/00) |
| Thanks for suggestions, but problem still occurring. Car will
start fine in the morning and drive normally for about 8 miles (11Km),
then the engine splutters and dies and will not re-start for the
rest of the day! ECU diagnosis shows a fault on the air flow meter,
but we have checked all the connections, even tried changing the
air flow meter - all to no avail. Engine will fire on ignition,
but will not pick up as the fuel is being shut off. Has anyone come
across this before? (5/00) |
| Wiring break down somewhere from heat .. careful tracing and wiggling
wiring loom and the air box .. slow work but if the ECU error codes
rarely lie. (5/00) |
|
If you've swapped the AFM then it's either the wiring between
the AFM and the ECU (probably a bad contact in the connector at
the AFM end) or a bad joint at the ECU end. Really carefully check
the AFM connector. Try pulling the connectors off the ECU and
replacing them a few times.
If the problem persists consider -
1) running new wires in parallel to the existing ones and connecting
them near AFM and ECU. If this fixes it then you have a loom fault.
2) Cutting off the AFM connector and splicing in a new one. Jay
Ng should be able to snip one off a scrapped vehicle for you.
3) If it's an ECU fault then pull it out and trace the lines from
the connector around the board. It's probably a dry joint where
the main connector meets the board or a dry joint elsewhere.
Someone might lend you an ECU to test things and/or tide you
over if necessary. (5/00)
|
|
We are [the garage who are] actually looking at this one, and
I have to say we're a bit stumped!
So far we have swopped the AFM, and the ECU, and checked all
wiring between the two for continuity. The ecu still reports the
fault as code 10 (afm). All is fine when very cold, and the car
will run for a couple of miles, then it just cuts. It will fire
when cranking but then just dies. I suspect the water temperature
sensor on the back of the engine, but don't understand why the
ecu is saying its the afm at fault!
Also its a real pain to swop the sensor, so that will have to
wait till the morning! If anyone has come across this kind of
problem before, any help would be gratefully received! (5/00)
|
|
similar fault on a Citroen.. a crack in a pipe between AFM and
throttle would only cause a serious leak when the plastic got
hot enough to deform .. after 15 miles... same going lean and
dieing engine..
.. but this one sounds hard .. should be able to just pull the
water temp sensor wire .. and put it into limp home mode for test..
I only have a 1.8 manual ..so no pointer for you there... (5/00)
|
|
Also its a real pain to swop the sensor, so that will have
to wait till the morning!
Can you just stick a meter on the wire at the ECU for this sensor
and see if the reading gets out of line when the fault happens?
I always like to see things being wrong before I try swapping
them, but I don't have lots of spares lying around.
You could also meter the AFM signals - tape three meters to the
dash and go for a drive! I suppose an air leak is possible. The
ECU knows roughly what the AFM should read at different RPM and
a leak will cause bad readings.
BTW Did you check all the AFM wiring including the temperature
thermistor? (5/00)
|
|
How about forcing the fuel pump into operation with the jumper
in the diag box (F/P to Ground)?
That will override the fuel cut off function of the air flow
meter.
Don't leave it like this, though. The fuel pump will run whenever
the ignition is switched on - and the cut-off is a safety feature!
The diagnostics only tell you if a sensor is open circuit or
shorted, not if it's providing the wrong info. But failure of
the water temp sensor shouldn't stop the engine anyway - in fact
I think you could disconnect it and hardly notice. (5/00)
|
|
Thanks all for help and advice. The fault has now been fixed!
It turned out to be a dry joint in the ecu (quite why we had
the same with a different ecu I don't know, but at the moment
don't have time to investigate!) After having exhausted all tests
in the manual, I took to tracing the circuits in the ecu, and
hey presto, pin 2P had a dry joint. (5/00)
|
|
I am glad you found the problem.
Dry joints can be funny things - many a satelite/probe has failed
besue of these. You can get continuty or not just by a few degress
changes in temperature and/or stress.
As to why you have 2 ECU's with the same problem, well I suspect
that there could be pins on the loom connector not exactly in
line, so when the ECU is plugged and un-plugged, it stresses the
PCB joint on the ECU mother board. If the joint already has an
inherent weakness, then it fails.
As to why 2 ECUs with the same weakness - well if they are about
the same age then it could be a "consistent" manufacturing defect.
Most likely a setup problem on the flow soldering machine, which
in my experience are a pig to get set up well for a particular
pruduction run. (5/00)
|
| I had a phone call from a rather desperate MX5 club member
(1995 Eunos Roadster) last night. He was driving along, and hit
a bump; not a big bump mind you. The car then died immediately.
It cranks over, but does not fire up. Obvious suggestion is check
connections in the ignition. What else should he look at? I had
suddenly remembered that some cars have a fuel pump trip, to prevent
fire in the event of an accident, but which can sometimes be tripped
by a minor shock (I know Rover 3500's have a small red switch behind
the dash). Do MX5s/Roadsters have anything like this? (12/00) |
No "shock" fuel cut, AFAIK.
Check connection to AFM (that incorporates a fuel cut switch) and
that the cambelt hasn't broken.
Check for sparks.
Check Immobiliser.
Check for fault codes.
Check fuel pump (Ignition on, short F/P and ground, listen at the
fuel filler)
Should be running by now! (12/00) |
| Cambelt broken? They just don't break by going over a bump do
they. This is a recent import,so I can't imagine there's many miles
on it. Fault codes in the Grainger's 1.6 manual the same as for
the 1.8? AFM connection had occured to me; is it a similar connector
to the 1.6 (ie. secured by a wire clip)? (12/00) |
|
Any garage owner will tell you - don't listen too much to the
customer's explanation of how the fault happened - it'll probably
be misleading. Cambelt is always worth checking on a non-runner.
Fault codes in the Grainger's 1.6 manual the same as for
the 1.8 ?
Yep a few extra ones on the 1.8, but nothing that would
be critical except 04 (SGC) 03 is SGT on a 1.8 (G on 1.6). Both
are fatal. (Timing signals from camshaft position sensor)
AFM connection had occured to me; is it a similar connector
to the 1.6 (ie. secured by a wire clip)?
Yep. Release wire clip, take it off, check for bent pins, and
carefully replace fully home. Check all the fuses, too. (12/00)
|
| If it is the cam-belt, it's more likely that the bump has caused
it to jump a bit rather than break. I had a Fraud Sierra do this
to me - just going round a roundabout, about to turn onto the M40,
and the belt slipped 180 degrees (yes, that is Pi radians). Slightly
more than a 14deg mod eh? Anyway, the engine just died completely
(not suprising really), and I had to coast on round and find a place
to park it. It's something to check if all else fails - the AFM
sounds more likely to me, I always check the electrics first. (12/00) |
| The '94 Miata shows a air bag system with ECU and
multiple sensors including one behind the front bumper ... but I
never saw that this tied into the engine ECU. (12/00) |
|
I've been having problems with the engine cutting out on my
Mk2 1.6, which has now done 28k miles. The problem started about
three weeks ago, just driving at about 40mph the engine cut out.
It restarted ok, but cut out a few times over the next few days.
There was no pattern, cold or hot, the bugger just cut out when
it felt like it, not very nice on the IDR through Reading in the
morning crawl hour.
I took it to Mazda, who after taking it out on a 30mile test
drive found it only cut out once. They changed the coil unit the
following week (five day wait for part from Belgium). But upon
driving to Oldham for the hols with cat and wife, it quit on the
M1 just before Sheffield (doing 70 (ish) in the fast lane at the
time).
Again it started ok, but when trying to accelerate it started
cutting out again, bigtime. Top marks for Mazda Assistance, who
arranged for a piggyback on wrecker truck to Oldham and then onto
the Mazda dealer in Stockport the following day.
Unfortunately it wouldn't cut out for them, but they did change
the plugs (should have been changed at 27k service I reckon),
and also changed the fuel pump relay just in case. Well, fingers
crossed it hasn't cut out since, (over 300 mile later). Has anyone
had similar problems ? (1/01)
|
| I had a similar problem on a VW Past-it I used to have. It was
the fuel pump relay, so that would be my guess in your case. (1/01) |
|
only similar was with a load of water getting into the plugs
and leads after an over zealous engine bay cleansing. No steam
just plenty of water and some leaked down the plug caps and gave
the engine a terrible tractor effective and loss of power till
high revs.
If base idle is too low then that will cut out when coming off
motorways after long periods of driving.
Another possibility could the the immobiliser being intermittant
if it just cuts dead, not an area that is thought about if just
a factory unit installed but could have same effect. Seem to remember
someone in the summer having a problem with the remote and it
randomly arming and disarming. (1/01)
|
|
If Mr Mazda has used his error code reader for the engine ECU
(please check) .. then they should know what is wrong .. and simple
things like fuel pump relays would be part covered by this. ..
the other alternative is for an after market alarm acting as
an immobiliser .. the Mk2 has a built in immobiliser on the engine
ECU linked to the key .. this could have a questionable connection
.. Do you have a big bunch of keys on the ignition key?? (this
makes car ignition keys unreliable). (1/01)
|
|
only similar was with a load of water getting into the
plugs and leads after an over zealous engine bay cleansing. No
steam just plenty of water and some leaked down the plug caps
and gave the engine a terrible tractor effective and loss of power
till high revs.
If the engine runs rough then suspect plugs and/or plug leads.
If it dies with an error code suspect a sensor.
If it dies without an error code suspect fuel or electric problem
(usually ignition switch). (1/01)
|
|
I asked the following on www.mx-5.com:
There are a number of well known cases of early '99 Miata's which
had an engine failure due to an improperly machined number 4 main
cap of the cylinder block. Does this problem also exist in early
'99 MX-5 engines (1.6l or 1.8l)? If it is, then which range of
VIN numbers might be susceptible to the problem?
and this is the reply I got: Yes this problem also applies
to early 99 NB 1,6L engines. The 1,8L never had this problem.
Only a very limited number had this problem and not all engines
in a VIN range were affected. Therefore we do not have a fixed
VIN range that we can publish.
Significant for this problem was, that in the majority of cases,
the engines were younger than 20.000 km. If the symptoms (knocking
when releasing the clutch under load, i.e. driving off) did not
appear before 20.000 km, the engine bearing is sound and the problem
will probably never appear. As most 99 MX-5 have a higher mileage
(km) now, we have no such problem any more.
So according to Mazda, 1.8l MX-5's (i.e.: european cars) should
be safe while early '99 1.6l MX-5's might also suffer from the
dreaded #4 bearing problem. That's not what I hoped :^(.
Granted, I do have 50000kms on my 1.6l, but I'm not sure whether
the problems in the US were really limited to low mileage engines.
(7/01)
|
| Ok now you got me seriously worried. My car has all the given
symptoms. It sounds like a diesel ever since I got it. It has 55k
km by now and the noise is still there. (7/01) |
| Check out http://www.miata.net/solo/99miatathrustbearingfailure.html
it has a _lot_ of information about this problem. The page also
claims that if your engine survives the first 20K kms, it should
be OK. But you could ask your dealer to measure the end play of
your crankshaft before your warranty runs out (that's what I intend
to do before March next year). It doesn't take a lot of effort to
do so, and it should give you a decisive answer about the state
of your engine. (7/01) |
| Well, my warranty runs out at the end of August. So it would be
kind of an emergency. I don't trust them when they say that if it
survives the 20k mark it should be ok. I have seen engines with
higher mileage being replaced, check out the miata forum register.
And being the usual victim of Murphy's law, I bet my engine will
break down by August. (7/01) |
|
If in doubt get an engineers report to confirm the state of the
engine. Also IF you have taken the car into the garage prior to
the warranty expiring and they give it a clean bill of health
and THEN the fault occurs and it can be proven back to the issue
then you have good recourse against the dealer and potentially
over the franschise operator in your region as the dealer often
works as an agent for them.
If it can be shown that the fault was a manufacturing fault and
was evident prior to the expiry of the warranty I would expect
them to honour the engine change no matter how old the car - especially
as this is a well known issue.
Before anyone suggests the same could be said for the NA LWC
issue then that is due to bad servicing that it fails as I understand
it - a mechanic not applying the correct torque when working on
the engine and is NOT a manufacuring fault so I would not expect
the manufacturer to stump up in that situation. (7/01)
|
| The problem WAS apparent here in the States... and we ONLY get
the 1.8 (7/01) |
|
I had heard this also last year from my mazda dealer. They have
a TSB describing the problem. They said thay had replaced 2 engines,
during the first 6 months of the 1.6l NB being available in the
UK.
Summary of situation
Affects: US 1.8l cars US. 1.8l protoge (323) European 1.6l
cars Other european Mazda models??
Not affects: European 1.8l cars
Why can this be?? Well one thing I do know that here a 2 types
of the 1.8l engine BP4W and BP4Y - the BP4Y is used in the US
where there are tighter emissions controls - For sure I know the
cams are different, as well as the block itself. The TSB on miata.net
lists a different part number for the Cal spec short engine, for
example.
If you have a European (or Japanese market) 1.8l NB you will
find many components are marked BP4W on the engine castings itself,
and many ancilliaries. Also (having taken a 1.8l NB engine apart)
the crankshaft, pistons valves etc are also marked accordingly.
On this engine there was no measurable wear on either thrust washer
after 13K miles, just some slight "polishing" of the rear most
washer that takes the force when the clutch is applied
(the crankshart weighs a f**king ton by the way - more than the
entire cylinder heard). I would be interested to hear what European
1.6l engines are marked with.I guess it could be B6 with a number
a letter afterwards.
From what I can gather, the problem is the selection of
incorrect sized thrust washers rather than the main cap being
incorrectly machined itself. A random problem caused by an individual
person or piece of line equipment I would guess.
There is probably more than one engine line in Mazda's factory.
We can perhaps summize the US 1.8l and European 1.6l line is shared,
while the 1.8l line for Europe and Japan are separate. If we hear
of more than one 1.8l NB engine failing in Europe then I guess
this throws my theory out of the window. (7/01)
|
| |