| What's the benefit of adding a brace bar?
I can't see how the small amount of extra rigidity would be noticable
in the handling. Wouldn't a front strut brace be better? Mine has
standard suspension and wheels and does seem to "shake" slightly
especially over bumpy roads. (11/99) |
| One brace doesn't do much, but put them all in and you won't recognize
the car again...It feels as stiff as if there were a hardtop mounted.
That means rear chassis brace, front chassis brace, brace behind
the seats (although this supposedly is only for safety reasons)
and front strut tower brace. (11/99) |
| I'm pretty sure our 92 1.6 already has a brace at the back. Is
this normal? (11/99) |
| The SE had front and rear chassis braces as standard. (11/99) |
| Take a drive along a straight and not too smooth road with top
down and observe for a few seconds, when-it-is-safe-to-do-so, the
point at which the top of the door meets the body just by your shoulder.
The sight of all the movement here will make you want to rush out
and buy a brace bar..... ;-) (11/99) |
| 92's had the rear chassis brace, but no cockpit brace. (I think
maybe the chassis brace was brought in on 91 models?) (11/99) |
| I have a 93 SE in completely standard form. Question is, will
I get any benefit from installing a brace bar behind the seats like
that on the later models? Also would a front strut brace do any
good? If so, anyone know of suppliers/prices? (11/99) |
|
Ive fitted Moss chassis braces front and rear and recently one
behind the seats. The car certainly feels tauter and seems to
turn in quicker into corners and generally be a little more responsive.
It has definatly made the car more rigid, quite noticable over
less than perfect roads.
The front/rear bars from moss cost me about 75 quid inc vat and
p&p, and can be fitted in an afternoon. I did it, and Im no mechanic.
The bigger chassis brace I got secondhand for 30 quid from a guy
off this list. This is a bit of a pain to put on (read total arse!!)
took me about 4/5 hours of messing about, it was a very tight
fit! Still I can now strip most of the trim from around my seats
like a demon ;o)
What about asking Jay Ng, the list
or any breakers if they have any secondhand braces. Also I know
John Cookson does a good homemade one thats cheap. (11/99)
|
Brace bars behind the seats work. Makes the car stiffer and less
crashy over rough roads) - well recommended - £30 + delivery
- contact self or Tim. Probably don't give a great handling improvement,
if any - but definitely feels nicer. Very similar to the Flyin'
Miata cockpit brace (which costs about $129 AIR) "Strut" braces
(actually they're not struts but we know what we're talking about)
apparently don't do a lot (they are most effective on McPherson
strut cars where side loads are put into the struts). However, my
view is that any brace helps a '5 to feel stiffer - you won't feel
handling benefits except at the very limits if you're very sensitive.
So might be worthwhile, but only if you've got
1) a front chassis brace (eg Moss)
2) a rear chassis brace (standard on yours, AFAIK)
3) rear cockpit brace. (12/99) |
| There was a wee flurry of postings on this subject a while ago.
Mx5 problem is that it has a very tall engine, nearly touching the
bonnet. Any "strut" brace in a 5 has to be not only bent, but thin
in its most important dimension. Terms chocolate and kettle spring
to mind.... Now for the flood of postings from folk who've fitted
one & it's transformed their car....(12/99) |
| No transformation, but there is a noticeable difference. Have
you ever seen one in real life? Or tried out a car with the FM shock
tower brace fitted? (12/99) |
|
Any "strut" brace
wrong
in a 5 has to be not only bent
wrong
but thin 2,5 cm (IIRC) diamter bar from shock tower to
shock tower in its most important dimension.
which one?
Now for the flood of postings from folk who've fitted one
& it's transformed their car....
It improved my car. It didn't transform it. (12/99)
|
| What are you talking about, the thing across the top of the 1.8s
and subsequent for distributing the side intrusion loads, the rear
suspension tie underneath (like I need) for the 89-91 1.6s, or something
entirely different? (12/99) |
4 brace bars relevant here: Sequence is order of importance IMHO
1) Front (underside) chassis brace - closes back of "U" chassis
member - stops it flexing - reduces bump steer (considerably) Standard
from '94(?) Available from Moss (and others)
2)Rear (underside) chassis brace - closes box of rear chassis/suspension
mount - reduces rear suspension mounting flex - therefore makes
things more predictable during high "G" or bumpy cornering. Standard
from '92 Available from Moss (and others)
3) Rear cockpit brace. Joins seat belt towers. Designed by Mazda
to reduce side intrusion - standard from '94(?) or is it 1.8's?
But alternatives fitted lower to the side of the towers stiffens
the body - greatly reduces body flex /shake on rough roads. See
miata.net/marketplace/Flyin' Miata/Cockpit brace (that's not intended
to be a link!) for the idea. Available from Tim Lovatt (timlovatt@kencomp.net),
Flyin' miata , Dealer Alternative (and others)
4) "Strut" brace - joins tops of front suspension shock absorber
towers. Standard on Mk 2's. Doesn't do a lot - but any brace stiffens
body and is a good thing. Available from various places!
I've got 1,2 and 3 :-)(12/99) |
| So your opinion on 4 is not based on experience, right? And since
when is this standard on mk 2´s? AFAIK, the 10AM has it, and maybe
some sports versions, but at least over here, it is not standard
on mk2´s.(12/99) |
| The MKII '5' Sport doesn't have this ...... and nor do any MKII's
to my knowledge, save the 10AE (12/99) |
| It isn't standard on Mk 2s is it? I thought just the AE and sports
editions had them. And for what it's worth, it does a good deal
if everything else is set up correctly, although it should be one
of the last things done...(12/99) |
| In europe it's the 10AE only In the US it's the 10AE and the sports
package (factory produced), which is NOT the same as the sport here.
The sports package in the states consists of the bilsteins, strut
brace, LSD and body kit and 15" alloys Deleted are electric windows,
power mirrors, windblocker. (12/99) |
| OK, I just went out to measure it. (the strut bar :))) The bar
is 25mm in diameter and has an adjuster and locknut whic is slightly
larger. The top of the bar is 6cm above the cam cover and I can
slam the bonnet though I only ever drop it. Once it gets past the
Engine it angles down slightly to a bracket on each strut top. Seems
pretty rigid to me, Can't say what it does for the feel as I never
drove a Mk2 without one. But it is much tighter than my old MK1.
(12/99) |
| If the bend is less than or near the diameter not much strength
will be lost. I've seen pictures of some jap kit in a publication
Jay Ng left me & all the modded cars
in there had strut braces with 3 to 5 inch bends, thats what my
initial comments were based on! (12/99) |
| I have a glass rear screen. Can I also fit the rear brace bar
behind the seats or does it obstruct the window ?? (12/99) |
| Not sure about the standard Mazda brace bar. The Lovatt one can
be fitted so that it does not obstruct a glass rear window. (12/99) |
| Glass window pushes past Berkley bar .. which is slightly bigger
than standard bar .. so no probs for you. (12/99) |
| Just a word to the wise. The cockpit brace bar behind the seats
in the later models of Mk1 is as far as I am aware an integral part
of the side intrusion protection. As the story goes, there is insufficient
strength on only one side of the car to provide sufficient protection,
so the brace which isn't a brace was installed, as a load transfer
device. As the earlier models don't have it, I guess it is up to
the user to sort work out their own level of " it'll never happen
to me". (2/00) |
| Can anyone suggest a good brace bar for a Mk 2? I've been using
a hard top through the winter and will miss the rigidity this gives
the car when I come to take it off (soon!). I want something that
a five year old can fit - ie no cutting, drilling, etc, but it must
be able to do the job and look good. (3/00) |
|
The only one that comes to mind that DOESN'T require a lot of
fitting is the Mazda UK Style bar, which is a low chromed one
sort of squared off.
The other style bars don't tend to be the no drill quick and
easy fit devices BUT are relatively easy to fit and usually reguire
a small amount of drilling.
You could go for the factory windblocker which will act as a
brace as well, as fitted to the 1.8 range. For simple bracing
you can get a plain black bar with fitting kit that is designed
for the 1.6 MK1 which SHOULD fit the MK2 but hasn't been tested
as yet. About the 37 mark posted to you. If you want any more
info on the Chrome or powder coated style bars which should give
you the bracing you want, drop us a line at mailto:enquires@donutz.co.uk
and work out which of the I.L.Motorsport bars would be suitable
and obviously a price as well!
IF you find another option please let
me know as always interested to find out what other products
are available and from whom etc. All to easy to miss something
out there! (3/00)
|
| I've got a Mk 2 actually, but on giving the windblocker the once
over this morning there didn't seem to be a lot of strength in the
underlying fitting - maybe I'm wrong. I have thought about Mike
Satur's design which looks strong and quite stylish - anyone got
one? (3/00) |
| I know that BSP in the States do a cockpit brace bar that would
fulfil your requirements but you cannot use the OEM windblocker
with it! I still haven't managed to figure out whether a Mk1 brace
would fit. It should do if the hoods are a straight swop. (3/00) |
| Anyone fitted a factory cockpit brace bar to an early car?
I have acquired such a bar, but was trying to sus how it fits in
the absence of a 1.8 car with the bar removed. I understand the
seatbelt towers have a tapped thread in them for the bar. Obviously,
on early this won't have one fitted. Do I need to tap a thread,
or is there someway of getting a nut into the towers that way? (3/00) |
| You are correct about the threaded seatbelt tower. I took my brace
bar off last week to have a look into my sub install. They are torqued
up one hell of a lot as well. I cant remember whether there is a
way to get behind the plate to add a bolt, I would think that the
"easiest" way would be to tap the thread. (3/00) |
| There's a nut missing in the seatbelt tower. The hole is there
though. So you could either weld a nut in there or else use a bolt
and insert if from the bottom up and just use a nut on top. Make
sure that the length of the bolt is correct of course. I welded
a nut in place...not easy to get to... had to drill a hole in the
tower to get the welding thingy through.. Easier to undo if I have
to take it off again for some odd reason (which has already been
the case a few times :) (3/00) |
| I fitted an OEM factory cockpit brace bar to my '91. The seatbelt
towers have already a hole for the brace. Just remove the seatbelts,
the plastic trim and you can easily fit the brace. You need two
bolts and nuts. To fit the brace correctly you have to cut some
of the plastic trim, but it's not too difficult. (3/00) |
|
Got the cockpit brace fitted this weekend.....it was a lot of
hassle (assembling, taking off, reassembling...), complicated
by the fact I had to reposition my "roll bar" (its not a real
one, just one that bolts directly to the rear deck (NOT the seatbelt
towers)).
Worthwhile points:
1. Its probably easier to fit one of the many aftermarket versions
that bolt between the seatbelt towers.
2. You need to remove the seatbelts temporarily to bolt in the
bar. Make sure you have access to a torque wrench, as I hate to
think of the consequences of bolt failure in an accident due to
someone applying "FT" (opposite to finger tight...).
3. A deep socket is needed if you bolt on the bar with the bolt
going down inside the seatbelt tower, and a nut attached inside
the tower. I didn't have a deep socket to fit, so inserted the
bolt the other way up, made captive by a nut and then fitted the
bar. Provided you get the bolt really tight, it doesn't turn in
on itself.
4. Trimming the seatbelt surround panels; easy. drill a hole,
centred 4 cm from the centre of the seatbelt hole. Use a Dremel
or hole-borer bit to widen to the correct size for the bar. Keep
the Dremel handy for a bit of trimming on the car. The fit of
the bar on my 92 was VERY tight (it looks like there is a slight
difference in the distance the seatbelt towers are apart from
later cars? Or maybe just production variation).
5. The seatbelt top caps foul with the end caps on the bar, with
the result the seat belt pivot is not fully free. I still have
to trim off some plastic from these bits.
Was it worth it?
A lot has been said on the Miata list about the fitment of this
bar in earlier cars. Technically, its part of the side impact
system (though why 93 model cars with the door impact bars don't
have it I don't know why), and supposedly according to Mazda won't
do anything for stiffness (though there seems to be precious little
difference ultimately between it and other aftermarket cockpit
braces, let alone what people reckon of style bars, or are we
all being fooled...).
On a brief road test yet, on back roads it didn't feel a whole
lot better, though the car hasn't been handling quite as well
as well post-accident repair as pre-accident (I suspect the garage
only checked the front 2 wheels for alignment....so 4 wheel alignment
is going to be needed) and the roads were a bit wet so I wasn't
really chucking it about. However, it is definetly less crashy
over pot holes, so that must mean something. I'm not particularly
tall, so the seat doesn't need to go all the way back, but I could
see how the squeak of the bar on the back of a seat could really
jangle someones nerves. Another advantage is that now I can use
the rear deck more for extra luggage space on a long trip. (3/00)
|
| There as been a lot of talk about front strut braces, front braces
and rear braces, along with cockpit braces. This is my view: there
are Mazda OEM braces that we all can use. The 1.8 M1 MX-5 as a Front
Strut Tower Bar, and a 3 piece Rear Bar (like the M2). The Cockpit
Brace is for security purposes only(so I'm told). The difference
of the car with these braces is HUGE! (3/00) |
| I brought the Freedom design strut brace while in the US; not
having fitted one before, is anything scarey going to happen if
I remove the 2 nuts on each strut in order to fit the mounting brackets?
(6/00) |
| No, they just locate the top of the shock mounts. Don't remove
the middle one though, holds the shock/spring assembly together,
although with the weight of the car sitting on it even this won't
matter. It'll just be difficult to torque it back up properly afterwards
(shock piston can rotate to some degree). (6/00) |
|
Anyone here got an MX5/Roadster/Miata with extra strengthening
bars down the side of the seats? I saw these bars in several pics
on an accessories site a week or so ago - but the bars themselves
weren't covered on the site. They were between the seat and the
doors. They're about the thickness of roll-over bars and were
diagonal - probably from the bulkhead (?) behind the seat at perhaps
one foot above the door sill to meet the floor just in front of
the front edge of the seat.
I saw a Miata rebuild site (dutch perhaps) that showed the
floor with seat and carpets removed and that had what looked like
extra mounting holes on the floor - perhaps that's there they
are fixed? Anyone know what I'm on about? :o)
I guess they're supposed to reduce scuttle shake? Anyone know
any more? (6/00)
|
| These are part of a racing roll cage - or just anti-deformation
bars - fitted to racing saloons and sports cars (and rally cars).
They are safety fittings - and make it jolly inconvenient to get
in or out! (6/00) |
| Help ! I've purchased a cockpit brace bar but can't seem to
find the correct sized bolts to attach to the existing holes in
my 1.8 Roadster . Are they metric or American ?? (6/00) |
| Well .. seeing as this is a Japanese car .. guess what .. Metric
:-o .. and they will be metric fine series .. so you will not get
them at B&Q... I think the seat belt bolt is the same thread ..
so either get them from a breaker .. or try them first and then
take the sample along to a bolt specialist.. (6/00) |
| Still looking for help / advice on what size bolts to fix cockpit
brace bar with . Have checked seat belt bolts but they're too small
. Have inquired of local Mazda agents they quote a part no 9YA021216
@ £7.50 each fortunately they didnt have any in stock so I didnt
have to cry at handing over £15.00 for 2 bolts .But they couldnt
tell me what size the bolts they are only a part no . (6/00) |
| When it was suggested about seat bolts I think they ment the ones
between the seat runners and the floor not the seat belts. (6/00) |
|
No I meant the seat belt bolts up by the brace bar .. they take
the same socket head in my Berkley bar'd version (just special
chromed bolts) .. and look very similar to an Engineer..
.. and 15 GBP is not terrible .. most bolt places now have a
min order of 30 GBP .. and there is still the question as to what
strength of bolt you fit .. Grade 8.8 is a minimum here while
Grade 6.4 is also available sometimes.. so think yourself lucky
at 15 GBP . I paid 30 GBP for 8 studs .. it could have been 4
studs for 30 GBP but I upped as it cost nothing more .. and now
I find they are 10-15mm too short .. oh well .. life at the edge
and all that! (6/00)
|
| My early (UK) mx5 doesn't have the lugs at the bottom of the
rear susp assembly to which these braces can be bolted. Any ideas
- has anyone tried bolting a strip across the holes halfway up the
assembly?? (7/00) |
| The brainstorm front and rear braces use the existing holes in
the suspension frames. The holes for the rear are horizontal not
vertical. (7/00) |
| The Moss rear brace attaches to the rear wishbone pivot bolts,
so you don't need any lugs, etc. You just remove the nuts (being
careful not to turn the adjustment cams), pop on the brace and replace
the nuts. (7/00) |
|
I fitted the Moss braces to my '91 Roadster at the weekend, and
they went on OK. The rear brace fits on the bolts that set the
rear toe in/out and camber. They're the same bolts that support
the lower wishbone to the chassis sub assembly, so are easy to
identify.
You'll need two 17mm spanners for the job, a jack, axle stands,
preferably a torque wrench, and some Tip-Ex.
Firstly, jack up the car and place it securely on the axle stands.
Then go under the car and paint a mark with the Tip-Ex on the
adjuster cams that set the toe in/out (these are on the rearward
facing end on the lower wishbone bolts).
Place one of your spanners over the head of the lower wishbone
bolt and hold it steady to prevent it from rotating, and slacken
the nut with the other (the nut is on the end facing the rear
of the car). This can be a bit tricky as the nut is on pretty
tight, but with enough determination and bad language, it'll come
off.
Then, depending on how much toe in/camber you have, the brace
will either slot over the ends of the bolts or, as in my case,
not. If the brace fits, then all you have to do is pop the nuts
back on and tighten up to 75lb ft, which is where the torque wrench
comes in, while holding the bolt with one of your spanners to
prevent it from rotating and upsetting your suspension settings.
If like on mine, the brace appears to be the wrong length and
won't fit, you'll have to turn the bolts that set the toe in.
They're on an eccentric cam, so rotating them will make the end
move towards the centre of the car, or away from it, depending
on the direction of rotation. Playing with this will allow you
to fit the brace over the ends of the bolts.
But rotating the bolts will upset the suspension settings, I
hear you cry! Yes it will, but as you were smart and marked up
the position of the adjuster cams with Tip-Ex before starting,
it's only a case of rotating them back to this position, and tightening
up the nuts as mentioned above. (7/00)
|
|
But rotating the bolts will upset the suspension settings,
I hear you cry! Yes it will, but as you were smart and marked
up the position of the adjuster cams with Tip-Ex before starting,
it's only a case of rotating them back to this position, and tightening
up the nuts as mentioned above.
.. not strictly true I'm afraid.. close but no real banana ..
there is quite a bit of movement between washer and bolt .. been
there while trying to DIY my alignment .. looked the same but
the bolt was in a different place .. you end up doing it 'all
from one side' to get it loaded one way. (7/00)
|
| Oh dear! Oh dear! What happened to KISS? Give this away. Buy a
Brainstorm rear brace. Two minutes one 13mm spanner (and one doesn't
touch the rear alignment). In words (and I hope I don't use a thousand).
BS brace is 1" approx dia tube bent into the standard sort of bathtub
shape. On each end welded to fit horizontally at 90 degrees to the
tub are the two attach fittings which comprise a 7/16" stud welded
into a tube. The studs install on the aft end of the wishbone fittings
into existing holes. As I said two minutes, and that includes the
time required to jack the car with an alligator jack. (7/00) |
| Fitted my 1992 1.6 with a 1.8 brace bar this weekend and had
a few little difficulties......... The actual bolting in place was
suprisingly easy using the recommended way using a bolt from underneath
and putting the nut on the top. 1.8's have a captive nut so you
just bolt it on. The bit I found was an absolute pig was getting
the trim back in place. I knew I'd have to cut the panel, but I
didn't realise how much has to come off to get the panel back in
place - and I've made a bit of a mess with the passenger side and
managed to nearly cut my forefinger off my left hand ! All done
it doesn't look too bad as most of the cutting is bits that you
don't see under the bar. Problem is that the bar is soo close to
the seatbelt tops that they don't swing round as much as they should
and has made the seatbelt feel tight when pulling towards yourself.
I guess on the 1.8 the seatbelt tower is a different shape allowing
the bar to sit higher and not be in the way - can anyone confirm
this? Also the triangular trim that covers the bolt on the seatbelt
top mount won't go back on as the brace bar is in the way - has
anyone else had difficulties? (12/00) |
|
I suspect the 1.8 has a different length seatbelt bolts. Maybe
try your local Mazda dealer and see if the part number is different.Maybe
either cutdown the spacer on the bar itself, so it sits lower,
or (try this first) use a longer bolt and lots of washers/spacers
so it fits a bit higher. Messing around with the seatbelt bolt
makes me nervous.
has anyone else had difficulties?
Yes; I did trim one side of SAZ9826; the endpiece on the bar itself.
(12/00)
|
Messing around with the seatbelt bolt makes me nervous.
Agreed - I'd rather not touch the seatbelt bolts and adjust the
brace bar to fit and work properly. The bar needs to sit higher
as the sides of the tower will not allow it to sit any lower. The
amount it needs to be raised to get all the trim back on would make
it less secure and then have less stiffening power I'd imagine.
Washers and spacers are OK as long as the down tubes at the end
of the bar still drop inside the edges of the tower. I'm thinking
of a 3mm raise with washers, which would allow the seatbelts to
rotate properly but the trim still wouldn't go back on to cover
the bolt. I wouldn't have needed to cut so much trim off I'f I'd
known I was raising the bar either. (12/00) |
| The 1.8 seat belt mounts have longer spacers and longer bolts
to mount it all a little bit higher... there does seem a lot of
spare thread on the bolts though .. and so with some careful measurement
a few washers may do the trick (but remember you need to allow the
bracket to swivel .. so you need them under the spacer collar. (12/00) |
| I've just been given one of these by a Miata driver (he brought
it back from the US for me on Sat!!) and ..... his '96 Mazda Miata
tower brace is 4 or 5 inches too short for my '92 (model) Eunos
Roadster!!!!!!!! AR*E!!! Did anyone know about this "difference"???
I must check it against an Irish '96 and see if there is a difference
in length (that said I think I remember a '96 brace from an Irish
car fitting a '92(ish) Roadster....) (6/01) |
| Are you sure you're lining up over the correct holes ok? (6/01) |
| 'I must check it against an Irish '96 and see if there is a difference
in length (that said I think I remember a '96 brace from an Irish
car fitting a '92(ish) Roadster....)' It could be somthing to do
with the differences between the pre and post 94 cars (ie 1.8 model
with rear brace bar etc) (6/01) |
| He hasn't given you a strut tower brace without the end fittings
has he? :-) (6/01) |
| End fittings??? What exactly do you mean by this??? The brace
has the plastic cover and the brace angles at the ends. It looks
as though it is pinched by the plastic surrounding the towers to
fit 'flush' .... ish... at the ends beyond the plastic are 2 holes
in the metal ends of the brace, one of which looks as though it
would fit perfectly onto the seat belt retaining nut on the top
of the tower..... (6/01) |
| I was talking about the brace that connects the two suspension
strut towers under the bonnet! Thought he may have given you something
that wasn't what you thought it was. A bit silly really. May be
worth asking the question re the difference in years on www.miataforum.com.
They are all awake over there now and if you precede your query
with URGENT you may be lucky and get a quick response. Post it under
'1990-97 Forum'. There is a box you can check so that you get an
e-mail prompt if someone answers. (6/01) |
| Don't know if this will help - just checked the OEM stainless
steel cockpit brace bar fitted to the Berkeley. This one fits to
the top of the seat belt towers with a bolt through the 'flat' end
of the bar. Doesn't use the same bolt as the seat belt mounting.
The distance between hole centres is (approx) 1060 mm. There are
no plastic ends etc on it If nothing else, you may be able to prove/disprove
that your bar is on the short side. Did a quick search on miata.net
('brace- in the 90-97 section) and it does sound as if some alteration
is required to some years. (6/01) |
| Looked at brace, looked at car... no holes that resembled stuff
I was told about here yesterday on the list...... Step one to skinning
first knuckle : Took apart trim around seat belt tower... ahhh HA!
Another hole.... whoo hoo! but unthreaded... booo!!! Second knuckle
: One quick ring to Andy Thompson later, trim completely off, another
hole found, so after I took out seatbelt reel (third knuckle), which
promptly ravelled up and refused to unravel, I managed to push a
bolt in a longreach socket up into this hole (fourth and fifth knuckle)
which allowed me to screw down the bolt from the top (thru the brace
hole). Went to refit (refitting is reverse of disassembly etc etc
) BUT of course the trim didn't fit... so... off came the roll bar,
this involved 10 large bolts including seat belt anchors on door
side sill (ran out of knuckles after this, so started on feet).
Trim was trimmed.. (?) and re-fitted, roll bar refitted.. We were
now getting a bit weak (from loss of blood), so after much swearing,
shouting, hammering, sawing, bandaging, it was on.... so much for
the 15 min job, it took up 2+ hours, if I'd been on my own... mmm...
maybe 3... beware the easy jobs!!!!!!!!! (6/01) |
| |
| |